Some school of thought accepts that solid economies ought to help the poor nations as far as supporting them in their essential needs, while a few others think it is because of the nearby governments to manage such inner issues. Albeit both the schools of thought have some solid legitimizations to bolster their thoughts, I for one concur with the first party more in view of a few key variables, incorporating absence of resources in such poor economies, the way that we are living in a worldwide society (Ward, 1962).
The primary imperative point I might want to specify is the way that the majority of poor economies is experiencing the absence of sufficiently having facilities and resources in the fields, for example, shelter, education and nourishment. But Evans & Kelley (2004) noted that the first may prompt making them considerably poorer, furthermore builds the measure of criminal activities and much more terrible at times possibly making a few individuals to join terroristic gatherings. While the latter cases, a few disagreeable results, for example, kids’ inability and demise.
Another vital thing is we ought not to overlook every one of the individuals on the planet are a piece of one group, the human being. Despite every one of the things makes us diverse, we all have the same biological makeup (Acemoglu & Robinson, 2012). Therefore, as a human everyone ought to attempt his/her best to do what he can to make the world all more satisfying spot for the others. Additionally, as it said above, a portion of the negative results, for example, terrorism might specifically influence alternate countries including first world nations.
To place everything more or less, supporting the poor nations to improve a life for their kin will bring about a few lovely results locally as well as now and again globally and more vitally, it all is legitimized by mankind.