Close

06/03/2021

Which two sentences describe the effects of the Louisiana Purchase on the United States?

Which two sentences describe the effects of the Louisiana Purchase on the United States?

The United States lost financially but ensured a lasting peace with France. The United States gained a large territory and secured important trade routes. The Purchase started a long period of westward migration in the United States. The Purchase led to the decline of slave labor in the southern United States.

What best describes the overall impact of the Louisiana Purchase?

Answer: The United States gained a large territory and secured important trade routes and the purchase started a long period of westward migration in the united states are the correct answers.

Why did Napoleon Bonaparte agree to see the Louisiana territory to the US?

By selling Louisiana to the U.S. in 1803, Napoleon obviated the need to defend it against the British, and he may have hoped that the need of the U.S. to defend the territory (against the British) might have brought America back to its alliance with France. Napoleon had pinned his hopes on victory in Europe.

Which two areas of the map made up the US in 1803 as a result of the Louisiana Purchase?

Which two areas of the map made up the United States in 1803 as a result of the Louisiana Purchase? Assured sole ownership of the Great Lakes. Ended Spanish control of the Southwest. Provided full access to the Mississippi River.

What are two reasons why the US government sent expeditions into the Louisiana Territory in the 1800?

he needed the United States to contribute military forces on the continent in his war against Britain….Check ALL that apply.

  • It provided land for people to settle.
  • It reduced the threat of foreign competition for North America.
  • It provided resources for Americans to use.
  • It opened new lands to exploration.

What are two reasons that the Louisiana Purchase?

Louisiana Purchase Negotiations It’s believed that the failure of France to put down a slave revolution in Haiti, the impending war with Great Britain and probable British naval blockade of France – combined with French economic difficulties – may have prompted Napoleon to offer Louisiana for sale to the United States.

What was the purpose of exploring the Louisiana Territory?

At Jefferson’s urging the American Philosophical Society sponsored an expedition in 1793 by the young French naturalist, André Michaux, to find “the shortest & most convenient route of communication between the U.S. & the Pacific ocean,” with the Missouri River “declared as the fundamental object.”

What gaps are still remaining in our knowledge about the Louisiana Territory?

Louisiana, however, included several readily evident errors and blank spaces, among them being a South Fork of the Platte River which extends far south into present-day New Mexico; the omission of the great Colorado River of the West, still awaiting discovery by the United States; an uncertain source of the Mississippi …

What were the features of the Louisiana Territory?

The Louisiana Territory was vast, stretching from the Gulf of Mexico in the south to Rupert’s Land in the north, and from the Mississippi River in the east to the Rocky Mountains in the west. Acquiring the territory doubled the size of the United States.

Why was Thomas Jefferson was uneasy about purchasing the Louisiana Territory?

Thomas Jefferson was uneasy about purchasing the Louisiana Territory because A he did not have the constitutional power to buy land from another country.

What concerns did Jefferson have about the Louisiana Purchase?

President Jefferson endorsed the purchase but believed that the Constitution did not provide the national government with the authority to make land acquisitions. He pondered whether a constitutional amendment might be needed to legalize the purchase.

What are some pros and cons of the Louisiana Purchase?

One pro of the Louisiana Purchase is that it doubled the size of the U.S. Cons were that people got worried that the country would get too big and impossible to govern. Another criticism was that it wasn’t clear that the purchase was constitutional. Another pro was the fact that the land was incredibly cheap.